● Filed with the USPTO · July 30 – August 3, 2026

Patent portfolio

Eight U.S. patent applications on file covering cross-manufacturer onboarding, the coordination protocol, verification-triggered payment, cross-vertical intelligence transfer, AI-mediated fleet command, multi-robot payload custody transfer, time-coherent sensor alignment, and voice-grounded spatial fleet command.

8
Applications filed
169
Formal claims
24
Independent claims
100
Compliance score
Validation status. Every specification passes a 23-point USPTO formal-compliance check at 100/100 with zero critical findings and zero warnings. Each carries three independent claims — a system claim, a method claim, and a non-transitory computer-readable medium claim — so coverage holds whether an infringing product ships as hardware, as software, or as a hosted subscription. A prior-art review across 141 results identified no blocking conflicts. All eight applications are on file with the USPTO and carry official application numbers.
  • SWM-2026-P01 · U.S. 64/122,242 · filed 2026-07-30 · Zero-configuration cross-manufacturer robotic device onboarding — PATENT PENDING
  • SWM-2026-P02 · U.S. 64/122,247 · filed 2026-07-30 · Universal cross-manufacturer autonomous machine coordination protocol — PATENT PENDING
  • SWM-2026-P03 · U.S. 64/122,249 · filed 2026-07-30 · Autonomous construction progress verification and automated payment — PATENT PENDING
  • SWM-2026-P04 · U.S. 64/122,252 · filed 2026-07-30 · Cross-vertical intelligence transfer for autonomous machine fleets — PATENT PENDING
  • SWM-2026-P05 · U.S. 64/122,254 · filed 2026-07-30 · AI-agent-mediated cross-manufacturer robotic fleet command interface — PATENT PENDING
  • SWM-2026-P06 · U.S. 64/122,260 · filed 2026-07-30 · Multi-robot cross-manufacturer payload custody transfer, cryptographic per-hop chain — PATENT PENDING
  • SWM-2026-P07 · U.S. 64/124,791 · filed 2026-08-03 · Onboarding-time latency profiling and time-coherent cross-manufacturer sensor alignment — PATENT PENDING
  • SWM-2026-P08 · U.S. 64/124,984 · filed 2026-08-03 · Voice-grounded spatial command, persistent named group macros, site enrollment by ambulatory narration, pre-arrival device provisioning — multiple independent claim families, including implementations not described on this page — PATENT PENDING
Method

How these were stress-tested

Each specification was attacked from nine expert perspectives — patent examiner, IP litigator, competing engineer, systems architect and others — across multiple independent models. Ninety hostile reviews per round, eight rounds.

ROUND 7

All red

Five vulnerability themes surfaced: §101 eligibility exposure, functional overbreadth, enablement gaps, cross-patent entanglement, and design-around paths. Every patent failed.

ROUND 8

All yellow

After targeted hardening — technical-effect anchors, narrowed claim language, self-contained definitions — hostile findings dropped 97%, from 31 red results to 1.

IMPLEMENTATION

Backed by working code

All 26 concepts claimed across the portfolio are implemented and verified in the engine running this site's live demo. Claims are not aspirational.

A note on document review versus execution. Eight rounds of adversarial review validated the specifications but could not validate the implementation. Running a genuine ten-manufacturer fleet exposed four defects in the engine — including two in collision-avoidance mathematics — that no amount of document review would have surfaced. All four are fixed, and none required a change to the claims. Reviewing a description and running a system are different activities, and both are necessary.