One fleet.
One operating standard.
Swarmonic is the one-mind coordination layer for an SI-operable robot fleet: machines from different manufacturers, one protocol, one command record, one operator seat. One Mind SI may occupy that seat. It does not own the robots or the license. Ownership stays with the buyer.
What is moving behind this text is the public demo fleet running on the same engine that serves this site: simulated robots drawn to their verified spec sheets, counts read live. Physical robot control is not offered on this page. That path is waitlist and NDA.
Secure by default, and you can watch it run
Exercised by 25 claim-mapped tests and a 209-check integration suite against the simulated fleet. See the live posture under Runtime internals on the demo, or read the security page.
A second brand is still a second fleet
Before USB, every peripheral needed its own port and its own driver. Robotics is still in that era. Fleet capability does not compound. Buying a second brand does not enlarge the fleet. It opens a second one.
Integration cost per vendor
Each manufacturer means another SDK, another security model, another support contract, and another console for the operator to watch.
No shared safety envelope
Vendor A's collision avoidance cannot see vendor B's robots. In a shared space, the only real safety layer is a human watching.
Nothing learns from anything
Operational experience stays trapped inside one vendor's fleet, and inside one site. The same lesson gets paid for repeatedly.
The hard parts
Swarmonic is not a dashboard that aggregates vendor APIs. These are the mechanisms the patents cover, and each one only becomes a problem in a mixed-vendor fleet.
Device discovery and enrolment
Scan a code or let the device announce itself. Swarmonic identifies the manufacturer, resolves a driver, negotiates what the machine can do, then physically tests it with a small commanded movement to confirm the device is telling the truth before it is trusted with work. Unrecognised manufacturers onboard through a generic profile rather than being rejected.
Temporal synchronisation across links
A drone on LTE sits ~140 ms behind an arm on PROFINET. Send both the same command at the same instant and they act at different moments — in a shared workspace, that is a collision. Swarmonic measures each device's latency continuously and dispatches early by exactly that margin, so they move together in real time.
Payment on verified work
Verified work has to be able to trigger money without a human clipboard. When a fleet's output is confirmed against the attestation chain, settlement can release automatically — commerce beside the control loop, never inside it.
Cross-vertical transfer
Coordination patterns learned in a warehouse are abstracted and applied to a different site, a different industry, a different mix of hardware. Transfers are checked for dimensional consistency, so a timing parameter can never be written into a distance constraint.
Intent, not joysticks
State the outcome — "inspect the north elevation and report defects." Swarmonic decomposes it into tasks, matches each to a capable device, propagates kinematic constraints, and clears every generated command through five safety stages. A manual path stays open for developers who want direct control.
The real engine, running on this page
The demo on this site runs the actual orchestration engine. The robots are simulated because we do not have ten manufacturers' hardware on a desk — but onboarding, capability negotiation, synchronisation, collision avoidance, SCP message signing and the attestation chain are all executing for real. Every number shown is read back out of the runtime.
Vertical-agnostic by construction
The coordination problem is identical everywhere: heterogeneous machines, one shared space, one intended outcome. Construction is a vertical, not the product.
Defense
Multiple robot classes from multiple suppliers under one operational picture, with an auditable command record.
Warehouse
AMRs, forklifts and arms from different vendors sharing aisles and handoffs without a per-vendor integration.
Construction
Progress capture and verification across drones, crawlers and legged platforms — optionally tied to payment release.
Agriculture
Mixed ground and aerial equipment coordinated over intermittent rural connectivity.
Different machines. Different makers.
One coordinated fleet.
Fourteen patent applications — all on file with the USPTO
Each specification carries 20 to 50 formal claims — with at least three independent claims written as a system, a method, and an apparatus or computer-readable medium, so each application describes system, method, and computer-readable-medium implementations.